Please help me with the following: A science class tested ways to clean up water after an oil spill. Each group of students received 100 ml of vegetable oil, 100 ml of motor oil and 800 ml of water in a rectangular plastic container. Each container also contained five floating wooden cubes (5 cubic centimeters each) representing animals in the water. Each group was tasked with removing as much oil as possible in 20 minutes, leaving “clean water” in the container, using the tools they brought to class. The results of the “cleaning” are shown in the table below.
Group_Vegetable Oil Removed (mL)__Engine Oil Removed (mL)
__1____________10_______________________20
__2____________110______________________130
__3____________60_______________________40
__4____________80_______________________70
A. Group 1
B. Group 2
C.Group 3
D.Group 4
I think the answer is B. Is B correct?
The scientific evidence that scientists use to support or criticize the conclusions of experiments generally consists of
A. raw data.
B. outliers.
C. accurate data.
D. data summary.
I think the answer is D. Is D correct?
Which statement describes a problem with the peer review process in scientific research?
A. He can sometimes reject important new ideas or new techniques.
B. It forces new scientists to the same standards as established scientists.
C. It always forces scientists to have to reanalyze their data.
D. It is often more difficult to justify a conclusion.
I think the answer is A. Is A correct?
Please help me by checking my answers. Any help is welcome!!! 🙂
PS There may be more to check. I agree on everything. Thank you Bobpurley!!!! 🙂
You helped me reach 100%! Which statement best describes a valid scientific claim?
The results of the experiment can be reproduced using any experiment method.
Results that support the claim are reproducible by other scientists following the same procedures.
The application is issued jointly by a major university and an established government agency.
The claim is supported by at least ten scientists in addition to the original researcher