Skip to content

Q2A Nether

Menu
  • Q2ANSWER Archive
  • Home
  • News
  • Categories
  • About
  • Contact
Menu

Judge rejects Ripple’s proposal to access trading history for SEC employees

Posted on October 20, 2022 by admin

Judge rejects Ripple’s proposal to access trading history for SEC employees

The content site is one of the sites that provide the service of answering general questions and solving puzzles and crossword puzzles

Where the content site is primarily interested in answering your questions in all areas, including solving puzzles and crossword puzzles

Answer Judge rejects Ripple’s proposal to access trading history for SEC employees

A federal judge in New York has rejected Ripple’s request to order the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to produce records of its employees’ crypto-trading transactions in an effort to prove that the authority does not consider XRP to be a security.

The SEC wins one against Ripple:

According for an official statementOn August 27, Ripple submitted a request to disclose the trading history to SEC employees, as Ripple believes that the SEC employees have already traded XRP, which means that they do not view it as a security but rather as a cryptocurrency.

According to Ripple’s defense, such evidence would undermine the SEC’s allegations that individual defendants acted recklessly and would strengthen the defendants’ fair warning defense.

Read:Crypto adoption in Africa is largely driven by retail and P2P activities

The defendants maintain that they are entitled to know whether the SEC allowed its employees to buy, sell and hold XRP as market participants during the relevant period.

But Judge Sarah Netbourne disagrees with Ripple’s claim for several reasons.

It supports the importance of the SEC’s argument that the pre-clearance decision process does not imply any decision by the SEC ethics advisor that trading complies with securities laws, i.e. the SEC ethics advisor has not proposed any relevant provision explicitly for XRP, so the SEC employee’s commercial registry is irrelevant to the case.

The other main argument for refusing was the lack of legal justification for agreeing to Ripple’s demands.

Whereas, US federal law preserves the privacy rights of SEC employees and regards them as US citizens.

In connection with the annual affidavits required by defendants, Congress has by default prohibited the disclosure of this financial information through federal privacy laws and regulations in order to preserve the privacy of government employees.

Ripple tried to use a similar argument earlier.

The SEC has requested access to Ripple’s internal communications via the Slack communications app.

This is what we mentioned earlier in the Arab Bitcoin, as Ripple believes that the production of such documents will be a long and expensive process.

Read:Robinhood’s Net Revenue Drops 43% Due to Decline in Cryptocurrency Trading

But this did not satisfy her before the court, which accepted the request of the SEC and asked Ripple to produce this data.

Ripple’s reaction:

Ripple did not overreact to the disappointing news.

Read:Bank of America CEO: We are in no hurry when it comes to cryptocurrency

Overall, the XRP price is moving around trying to keep pace with Ripple’s case status with the SEC, with highs when Ripple wins and dips when the San Francisco-based company faces any setbacks (like today).

Currently, XRP is trading around $0.92, down about 2% in the last 24 hours.

In fact, it seems that the impact of the price of the digital currency Ripple is not related to the issue, but to the market as a whole, which is witnessing a correction with the decline of Bitcoin to the level below 42 thousand dollars.

Read also:

For the first time, the US Treasury imposes sanctions on a cryptocurrency trading platform

Ethereum price drops to a record low for the first time since early August 2021


And you can ask questions on the content site through the word “Ask a question” at the top of the site, where we answer your questions in a short time

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Een ….. vangt geen vliegen (5)?
  • Hierin maken we een minder waterige jus d’orange. (13) letters (crypt.?
  • VREEMD HOOR DAT HET THEMA GELDT ZOLANG HET DUURT?
  • ONGEACHT 7 LETTERS – Puzzelwoorden?
  • GLANS 5 LETTERS – Puzzelwoorden?

LOREM IPSUM

Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus voluptatem fringilla tempor dignissim at, pretium et arcu. Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste tempor dignissim at, pretium et arcu natus voluptatem fringilla.

LOREM IPSUM

Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus voluptatem fringilla tempor dignissim at, pretium et arcu. Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste tempor dignissim at, pretium et arcu natus voluptatem fringilla.

LOREM IPSUM

Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus voluptatem fringilla tempor dignissim at, pretium et arcu. Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste tempor dignissim at, pretium et arcu natus voluptatem fringilla.

©2026 Q2A Nether | Design: Newspaperly WordPress Theme